Summary of differences between 40-km and 60-km versions of RUC/MAPS

Summary of differences between 40-km and 60-km versions of RUC/MAPS

WHAT'S NEW ABOUT THE RUC-2?

1. Frequency of Assimilating Observations

In the old version of the Rapid Update Cycle (RUC-1), observations are assimilated once every three hours. In the new version (RUC-2) observations are assimilated hourly.

2. Time of Availability

In the 60km RUC-1, the data cutoff time is +1h, 20 min. For the 40km RUC-2, the data cutoff time is about +0h 20 min, meaning that RUC-2 analyses and forecasts are available almost an hour earlier than those from the RUC-1. A catch-up cycle will be used to assimilate late-arriving rawinsonde data at 0000 and 1200 UTC, and forecasts will be run from the catch-up cycle rather than the first cycle at these times.

3. Computational Grid

RUC-2 covers a geographical domain about 50% larger in area than the 60km RUC-1, extending further in all directions, but especially in the southeast, north, and west, and covering considerably more oceanic area. Moving the boundaries slightly farther from the coasts has significantly improved forecasts in these areas. The old RUC-1 grid has 60-km resolution (81 x 62 grid) and 25 levels. The new grid has 40-km resolution (151 x 113) and 40 levels. The RUC-2 continues to use an isentropic-sigma hybrid vertical coordinate.

4. Data Assimilated

There are several new types of observations assimilated into RUC-2 not present in the 60km RUC. These include:

The following (used in the 40-km MAPS at FSL) will be added to the RUC-2 when they become available at NCEP:

5. Moist Physics

Clouds must be inferred from the relative humidity field in RUC-1. In RUC-2, a comprehensive cloud physics package has been imported from the NCAR/Penn State MM5 mesoscale model. Mixing ratios of five types of hydrometeors are explicitly predicted: cloud water, rain water, snow, ice crystals, and graupel. Even the number density of ice crystals is predicted as part of the microphysical processes. Cloud fields initialize each RUC-2 model run, using the most recent hydrometeor forecast to avoid cloud spin-up problems.

6. Surface Processes

The RUC-1 calculates surface fluxes using a simple surface slab with constant soil moisture availability. The RUC-2 features a multi-level soil and vegetation model with evolving soil moisture and temperature fields that are far more accurate than climatology. Snow accumulation and melting are accounted for.

The 60-km RUC employs a coarse land use data and derives sea surface temperatures from climatology and does not consider snow cover. The RUC-2 employs improved land use data, including vegetation class, monthly vegetation fraction from NESDIS, and soil type; it utilizes daily detailed fields of sea-surface and lake-surface (for the Great Lakes) temperature. It also cycles snow cover and canopy water along with the soil fields to further improve short-range forecasts.

7. Turbulence

The RUC-1 computes turbulent fluxes from a formulation due to Mellor and Yamada (Level 2.0). The RUC-2 calculates the kinetic energy associated with turbulence (TKE) explicitly from equations derived by Burk and Thompson (Level 3.0). Boundary fluxes are improved using the explicit turbulence parameterization, and explicit TKE maxima are commonly found in upper-level frontal zones.

8. Radiation

There was no explicit calculation of atmospheric radiative fluxes in the RUC-1, a simplification partly responsible for its warm bias. Full atmospheric radiation imported from the MM5 model is included in RUC-2. The radiative heating/cooling is influenced by hydrometeors (clouds) at each model level.

9. Lateral boundary conditions

The old RUC-1 used lateral boundary conditions specified from the NGM model at 6-h intervals. RUC-2 uses early Eta model boundary values specified at 3-h intervals.

Most dramatic improvements in RUC-2 fields over those from RUC-1. There are improvements in almost every field from RUC-2, and also many useful new fields not provided in RUC-1. These are some of the highlights